?‘?????°?‚?‹́?€??: bogatyr, mythic hero, strongman, warrior
Just when you think you've seen it all, you come across a video of a Russian schoolteacher telling her students that there was a great civilization in Russia 3,000 years ago called ???????‚?°?? ? ?????? (Holy Rus) inhabited by godlike men called ?±?????°?‚?‹?€?? (bogatyrs, mythic warriors and heroes). We know they are godlike, she explains, because of their name, ?±?????°?‚?‹?€??. And then she deciphers it: ?? ?‘???????? ???° ?‚?‹ (on a first-name basis with God).
OK, you think, there's my daily dose of nuts. No biggie; every nation has its crazies. But … just in case, let's check out what other people are saying about ?±?????°?‚?‹?€??. And you discover: It's a Thing. All kinds of armchair folk etymologists are insisting that godlike creatures called ?±?????°?‚?‹?€?? once lived in what is now Russia.
What's an armchair folk etymologist? It's someone with no specialized knowledge of the language or its history, who looks at a word and makes up stories about its meaning. Sometimes this is charming. I know someone who grew up in the Urals and thought, when he was little, that faraway Moscow was the place where the 100 most important people in the country lived — because he parsed the word ???‚???»???†?° (capital) as ???‚?? ?»???† (100 people).
But he was 8 years old. Here's what someone identified as a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences writes about the word ?±?????°?‚?‹?€??: ?‘?????° ?‚?‹ ?‚?? ?µ???‚??, ?‘?????? ?‚?‹ ???€?????°???»?µ?¶??????. (You are of God, that is, you belong to God.) ?—?°???µ?€???°???‰?µ?µ ? — ???‚?? ?·?????? ???€???·?‹ ?? ?????µ???°, ???? ?????µ???° ???€?°???µ??????????, ?»??????????????. (The "r" at the end is the sound of threat and anger, but it is righteous anger, the anger of a lion.) ?’???€???‡?µ??, ???????????»?????? ?‘???? ?±?»?°??, ?? ?????µ?? ?•???? ???°???€?°???»?µ?? ?»?????? ???° ???€?µ?…, ???‚???‚ ?·?????? ?????????‡?‘??: ? ?¬. (And besides, because God is good and His anger is only directed at sin, the sound is lightened with a soft sign at the end of it.)
And then there's this: ?‘?????°?‚?‹?€?? ?·???°?‡???‚ ?‚???‚, ???‚?? ???€?°???‘?‚ ("?‚?‹?€???‚") ???±?€?°?· ?‘?????°. (A bogatyr is someone who steals — the verb ?‚?‹?€???‚?? — the image of God.) Sitting in his armchair, this guy doesn't need to explain how the slang word ?‚?‹?€???‚??, which seems to have been coined in the second half of the 19th century, was used 3,000 years ago.
These modern faux etymologists dismiss the work of brilliant, erudite, obsessive, experienced Russian and foreign etymologists with an airy: ?•???‚?? ?????µ????e … (There is an opinion … ). This would be like me rewriting the periodic table with a dismissive wave of the hand: ?? ???µ?????µ?»?µ?µ???° ?µ???‚?? ???????µ ?????µ?????µ … (Mendeleev has his opinion … ).
But real etymologists trace the word from an ancient Turkic language, although they can't say which exact language and place lent the word. But the Turkic word bagatur meant a knight and hero, and the ending probably shifted from –???€?? to –?‹?€?? under the influence of other words like ???????????‹?€?? (guide). The word might have migrated from a Persian language, but that seems less likely. In any case, it's not a "native" Russian word.
So what's the problem? Why are so many people obsessed with proving that ?±?????°?‚?‹?€?? is not a borrowed word?
And then I realized what it is. Some people don't want mythic ancient Russian heroes to have a name borrowed from another language. So they are manufacturing a "native Russian" etymology.
It's ?????????€?‚???·?°???µ?‰?µ?????µ (import substitution)!
Michele A. Berdy, a Moscow-based translator and interpreter, is author of "The Russian Word's Worth" (Glas), a collection of her columns.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.