Support The Moscow Times!

Reviving an Old Cuban Love Affair

Cuba is a place of incongruous sights. Perfectly preserved American cars from the ’50s, some manufactured by companies that no longer exist, glide through crumbling streets. Equally incongruous is the Our Lady of Kazan Russian Orthodox Cathedral with its golden cupolas in Havana’s pleasantly seedy waterfront. The dedication ceremony in October 2008 was attended by the robed and bearded Metropolitan Kirill (soon to be patriarch) and Cuban President Raul Castro dressed in a dark suit and tie. In a display of commendable Communist integrity, Raul slipped away before the liturgical service began.

What gives? Why was this project, launched when Fidel Castro was still at the helm, paid for mostly by the Cuban government? There are only about 4,000 Russians living in Cuba, most of them Soviets who married locals. Some 30,000 Russian tourists come to Cuba each year, but prayer is probably not at the top of their list.

Many Cubans remember the years of Soviet aid fondly. Why not? They were essentially receiving free money, and consumer goods were plentiful as they haven’t been since. But the Cubans also retain a certain bitterness at the speed with which they were abandoned after the Soviet Union collapsed. In June 2002, Fidel said Russia had betrayed Cuba. And for the Russians, there is still the little matter of Cuba’s outstanding debt of $20 billion.

Cuba needs money, spare parts for Soviet military equipment and a sense of alliance with a heavyweight player. During President Dmitry Medvedev’s November 2008 visit, Fidel declared that Russia and Cuba were natural partners because both were “constantly threatened by the same adversary of peace.”

A senior U.S. official has stated that Russia “has strategic ties to Cuba again, or at least that’s where they’re going.” Some say the Russians want to refit the listening post in Lourdes, outside Havana, which they abandoned in 2002, for use in cyber-espionage and cyber-warfare. Or the Russians might want a refueling base for their naval vessels and their bombers, which have resumed aggressive patrolling. (Right after Medvedev’s visit, Nikolai Patrushev, head of the Security Council, as well as Alexander Maslov, head of Russia’s air defense, also visited Havana.) But these are secondary, tactical considerations.

Russia’s No. 1 foreign policy objective is to keep Ukraine out of NATO. At the moment, NATO membership hardly seems imminent. Disappointed in liberalism, Ukraine is becoming more pro-

Russian, and Europe is relieved not to deal with that troublesome country for the time being.

But things change. A Ukraine disappointed in its rapprochement with Moscow could easily swing back to the West, at which time Europe might revive its interest in having Ukraine in NATO. Good chess players always think several moves ahead.

What piece can counterbalance Ukraine, which borders Russia? Cuba, almost on the U.S. border, seems the most likely. The Russians would not reinstall missile bases in Cuba, but they could beef up their bomber flights, naval exercises and intelligence gathering with in-your-face aggressiveness.

All sorts of unfortunate consequences could flow from this. The cause of freedom in Cuba would be set back for another generation, Florida’s hawkish Cuban exiles could tip U.S. politics to the right, and Moscow would be at loggerheads with Washington for years. 

Though his attention is drawn by places as disparate as Yemen and Haiti, U.S. President Barack Obama should also keep an eye on Cuba, that isle of the incongruous, right off America’s shores.

Richard Lourie is author of “The Autobiography of Joseph Stalin” and “Sakharov: A Biography.”

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Our weekly newsletter contains a hand-picked selection of news, features, analysiss and more from The Moscow Times. You will receive it in your mailbox every Friday. Never miss the latest news from Russia. Preview
Subscribers agree to the Privacy Policy

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more