I feel a rant coming on. Actually, I've been working up to a rant ever since the Russian press got hold of Jeffrey Goldberg's enormous piece called "The Obama Doctrine" that was published in the Atlantic magazine. Out of about 20,000 words covering seven years of foreign policy decisions and considerations, what did the Russian media focus on? Four words: "he's not completely stupid."
And although these words were said about Vladimir Putin, they were not the only words Barack Obama said about the Russian president. But they got almost all the attention.
The first issue was what they meant. One writer insisted: ??‚?? ?„?€?°?·?? ?????¶???? ???µ?€?µ???µ???‚?? ???°?? "?????????µ?? ???µ ???»?????‹??" ???»?? ?¶?µ "???µ ?????????µ?? ???»?????‹??" — ???????? ???°?? ???€?°?????‚???? (You can translate that phrase as "not at all stupid" or as "not completely stupid" ?€” however you like.) A lot of people who should have known better agreed with this, and it was hotly debated in the social media. ?????¶???? ?„?€?°?·?? ?‚?€?°???‚?????°?‚?? ????-?€?°?·???????? (You can interpret this phrase in different ways.) ?? ?????¶?µ?‚ ?±?‹?‚??, ???????????‹???»?µ?????????‚?? ?????µ?†???°?»?????? ?????‚?°???»?µ???°? (Maybe ambiguity was left there intentionally?)
But all that is as wrong as could be; there's nothing ambiguous about the phrase at all. It can only mean "???µ ?????????µ?? ???»?????‹??" (not completely stupid).
Russians came up with dozens of more or less correct translations, although some were a great deal stronger or slangier or ruder than Obama's phrase. If you ever want to say this in Russian, you can choose from: ???µ ?????????µ?? ?¶?µ ???? ???»?????‹?? (He's not completely stupid); ???µ ???????‡?µ???‹?? ?¶?µ ???? ?????????‚ (He's not a total idiot); ???? ?¶?µ ???µ ?????????‡?°?‚?µ?»?????? ???±?€?µ???????»! (He hasn't completely lost his mind!); ???? ???µ ?????»???‹?? ?????€?°?? (He's not a complete fool.)
But those discussions were on Facebook pages frequented by language nerds. After a day or two, the niceties of context, if they were ever under discussion, had disappeared. Now the news was simple: ???±?°???° ?????°?·?°?», ?‡?‚?? ?????‚???? ?€” ?‚???????†?°. (Obama said that Putin was dumb as a stick.)
And here I start to lose it. Because the words were said in a specific context, in reply to a specific comment ("I had been under the impression that Obama viewed Putin as nasty"), in a spoken conversation, with punctuation added by the journalist.
The real news was that Obama had good things to say about Putin. He said he was "scrupulously polite, very frank. Our meetings are very businesslike." And then he said why Putin is behaving this way. He wants to be seen as a peer when his country is not the economic or political equal of the United States. "He's not completely stupid" ?€” he knows that, and that's why he's on good behavior.
It's not Obama's assessment of Putin's intelligence. It's a throwaway line, almost a figure of speech, the kind of thing you say in English and Russian all the time: ?? ?¶?µ ???µ ?????»???°?? ?????€?°. ?? ???????????°??, ???°?? ???°???? ???µ?±?? ???µ???‚?? (I'm not a complete idiot. I know how to behave.)
But now this will get filed with all the other carefully culled and intentionally mistranslated American "insults" and become common knowledge.
Years ago I joked that Russia had finally found its ???°?†???????°?»?????°?? ?????µ?? (national idea), and it was: ???°?? ???±???¶?°???‚! (They're mean to us!) I was almost right. It might not be the national idea, but it has become the national rallying cry.
Michele A. Berdy, a Moscow-based translator and interpreter, is author of "The Russian Word's Worth" (Glas), a collection of her columns.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.