×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

On This Day 24 Years Ago: Russia's Kursk Submarine Disaster

On this day 24 years ago, Russia’s Kursk submarine sank following an explosion during naval exercises in the Barents Sea, killing all 118 personnel on board — a tragedy that became one of the biggest stains on President Vladimir Putin’s early rule.

The explosion that led to the sinking was traced to a leak of hydrogen peroxide that came into contact with a catalyst, causing the failure of a Type 65-76A torpedo in the forward torpedo room. This was followed by a second explosion, which split the submarine and caused it to rapidly sink. According to the Norwegian Seismic Array Service, seismic events were recorded by Norwegian, Canadian and American stations; the Norwegian service identified the activity as “explosions,” not earthquakes.

Evidence collected after the submarine was salvaged indicated that some of the sailors survived for up to eight hours following the explosion.

The rescue efforts and its aftermath were mired in controversy. Putin, who was vacationing in Sochi at the time, refused aid offered by France, Germany, Italy, Norway, the U.S. and Britain. He did not accept international help until five days after the explosion. The Russian authorities further downplayed the incident and the Russian Navy's response was criticized as slow and inept.

The controversy deepened after lawyer Boris Kuznetsov, who represented many families of the sailors who died on the vessel, claimed that Putin, after meeting with the wives of the deceased, called Boris Berezovsky and referred to the women as “whores,” saying: “[The wives] were hired for $10 to discredit me!” Kuznetsov eventually wrote a book on the tragedy and fled Russia in 2007 to avoid persecution by the Russian authorities.

According to a declassified CIA report from December 2000, the Russian commission responsible for investigating the accident did not attribute blame to the U.S. or Britain. However, the report notes that the Russian public continued to believe strongly that the sinking was the result of a collision with a NATO vessel.

No individuals have been held criminally responsible by the Russian authorities for the tragedy.