High-profile Kremlin loyalists voiced support for the military’s decision to withdraw from the strategic southern Ukrainian city of Kherson on Wednesday, the latest major reversal for Russia's embattled offensive in Ukraine.
Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu ordered to pull troops out of Kherson and set up defenses on the left bank of the Dnipro River after Russia’s commander in Ukraine, Gen. Sergei Surovikin, told him in a televised meeting that supplying the right bank was no longer feasible.
Margarita Simonyan, the head of the state-funded RT network, said the retreat was a necessary move to avoid exposing Russian troops on the right bank of the Dnipro and "opening the way to Crimea” for Ukraine’s forces.
She compared the retreat to Gen. Mikhail Kutuzov’s 1812 withdrawal from Moscow as Napoleon’s troops invaded Russia.
Yevgeny Prigozhin, the Kremlin-linked founder of the Wagner mercenary group, said the “extremely difficult” task of withdrawing troops with minimal losses would be “the greatest achievement that Surovikin will have to accomplish.”
“It doesn’t do the Russian army justice, but it emphasizes the commander’s personal qualities,” Prigozhin’s press service wrote on social media, praising Surovikin for “not being afraid of responsibility” and “taking the full weight of the decision.”
Chechen strongman Ramzan Kadyrov voiced “full agreement” with Prigozhin, calling the recently appointed commander’s decision "difficult but fair.”
“Surovikin both spares his soldiers and takes a more advantageous, comfortable and safe strategic position,” Kadyrov wrote in a post on the Telegram messaging app.
All three figures previously criticized the Russian military’s defeat in Lyman, a key supply hub for Russian forces in eastern Ukraine before Kyiv’s troops recaptured it last month.
Despite their praise for Surovikin, Prigozhin and Kadyrov still raised doubts over Russia’s military decision-making.
Kadyrov asked why ensuring supplies to Kherson “wasn’t done from the start,” while Prigozhin said the military should “understand who’s right, who’s wrong and what the problem is.”
"It’s important not to agonize, not to thrash around in paranoia, but to draw conclusions and work on mistakes," Prigozhin said.
Their reactions followed reports by the independent media outlet Meduza that the Kremlin has ordered state media to avoid quoting officials who criticize Russia’s campaign in Ukraine.
Russian state media characterized the Kherson announcement as a “maneuver” or “regrouping” rather than a “retreat.”
Leading state television host Vladimir Solovyov called it a “difficult decision…but brave” in his evening program, adding: “Trust the generals.”
Sergei Mironov, another vocal supporter of Russia’s invasion who heads the minority A Just Russia party in the lower house of parliament, lamented Kherson’s loss in a tweet and vowed “retribution” and the city’s recapture.
Popular Russian pro-war bloggers voiced similar reactions, with one saying “this betrayal is carved in my heart for centuries” and another writing “it will leave a scar on my heart.”
Others slammed Russia’s military command for being misled by false reports and relying on “idiotic” war planning “based on disinformation.”
President Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, stayed silent on the announced pullback as he toured a hospital, met the head of Russia’s national public health institute and spoke at an event commemorating its 75th anniversary.
Kherson city was the first urban hub captured by Russia during its "special military operation" and the only regional capital to be controlled by Moscow's forces since its offensive began on Feb. 24.
Kherson was one of four Ukrainian regions that Russia declared it had annexed in September, shortly after being forced to withdraw from swaths of territory in the northeastern Kharkiv region.
AFP contributed reporting.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
