×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Eco Ratings for Cities Don't Jibe

Differing criteria for air pollution have led one analysis to give Moscow second place, another second from last. Vladimir Filonov

Kursk, a city in southern Russia, had the best ecology of the country's 85 largest cities in 2012, according to a study released by the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry.

Moscow came second and Kaluga third. However, these findings do not jibe with the results of a similar study that RIA Rating agency published a month ago.

The ministry's report, released last week, used methodology developed by Ernst & Young and considered a variety of factors including the quality of air, water consumption and quality, waste treatment, transportation, land use, energy saving and environmental management.

Tomsk, Tver and Stavropol came out at the bottom of the list.

The RIA rating, released Aug. 6, placed Moscow as the second most polluted city, with Norilsk and St. Petersburg also making the top three.

The environment ministry responded two days later that the results of this study could be inaccurate because the methodology used did not include factors such as population density, quantity of cars and the level of the toxicity of elements released into the air.  

For example, the ministry noted that the sulfur dioxide people breathe in Krasnoyarsk is twice as toxic as the nitrogen dioxide detected in Moscow's air, according to an official statement.

The Environment Ministry released its first rating on city ecology in 2011. Volgograd topped the list as the cleanest city while Moscow came in sixth.

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more