With most of the world focused on economic instability and anemic growth in the advanced countries, developing countries, with the possible exception of China, have received relatively little attention. But as a group, emerging-market economies have been negatively affected by the recent downturn in developed countries. Can they rebound on their own?
The major emerging economies were the world's main growth engines following the financial crisis in 2008, and to some extent they still are. But their resilience has always been a function of their ability to generate enough incremental aggregate demand to support their growth without having to make up for a large loss of demand in developed countries.
A combination of negligible, or even negative, growth in Europe and a significant slowdown in the U.S. has now created that loss, undermining emerging economies' exports. Europe is a major export destination for many developing countries and is China's largest foreign market. China, in turn, is a major market for final products, intermediate goods —including those used to produce finished exports — and commodities. The ripple effect from Europe's stalling economy has thus spread rapidly to the rest of Asia.
The key questions for the world economy today are how significant the growth slowdown will be and how long it will last. With wise policy responses, the impact is likely to be relatively mild and short-lived.
One key issue clouding the future is trade financing. European banks, traditionally a major source of trade financing, have pulled back dramatically because of capital inadequacy caused by sovereign-debt capital losses and, in some cases, losses from real-estate lending. This vacuum could reduce trade flows even if demand were present. In Asia, filling the vacuum with alternative financing mechanisms has become a high priority.
Although China's tradable sector is highly exposed to developed economies, Beijing is likely to accept some short-run slowdown rather than adopt potentially distorting stimulus measures. Given the risk of reinflating asset bubbles, no one should expect a dramatic easing of credit like the one that followed the 2008 meltdown.
An accelerated public-investment program that avoids low-return projects is not out of the question. But the best and most likely responses are those that accelerate domestic consumption growth by increasing household income, effectively deploy income from state-owned assets and strengthen China's social security systems to reduce precautionary saving. These are all key components of China's recently adopted 12th five-year plan.
Admittedly, China's major systemic reforms await the country's leadership transition, now expected in November. By most accounts, the pace of reform directed at expanding the market side of the economy needs to pick up quickly to achieve the ambitious economic and social goals of the next five years.
Some countries have bucked the global trend. Indonesia, for example, has experienced accelerating growth, with rising business and consumer confidence boosting investment to almost 33 percent of gross domestic product.
Likewise, Brazil's growth has been dented but now looks set to recover. Moreover, overall economic performance in Brazil masks an important fact. Growth rates have been substantially higher among the country's poorer citizens, and unemployment is declining. The aggregate growth rate does not capture this inclusiveness and thus understates the pace of economic and social progress.
The main challenge for Brazil is to increase its investment rate from 18 percent of GDP currently to closer to 25 percent. Commodity dependence, even with the creation of considerable domestic value added, remains high.
Economic growth rates in other large countries, including Turkey and Mexico, have risen as well, despite European and U.S. headwinds. Many African countries, too, are showing a broad pattern of sound macroeconomic fundamentals and durable growth acceleration.
The outlook for India's economy remains more uncertain. While growth slowed recently from very high rates, owing to a combination of exposure to developed-country weakness and declining investor confidence, that trend appears to be reversing after decisive moves by the government. The main question is whether India's parliament will pass crucial legislation or remain paralyzed by partisan and scandal-fueled infighting.
This general picture is combined with more general developing-country trends, such as rising incomes, rapid growth in middle classes, expanding trade and investment flows, bilateral and regional free-trade agreements and a growing share — roughly 50 percent — of global GDP. Thus, the growth momentum of these economies should return relatively rapidly over the next one or two years.
Most of the downside risk to this scenario lies in the systemically important economies of Europe, the United States and China. Derailing emerging economies' growth momentum at this stage probably would require either an additional major demand shock from the advanced economies or some kind of failure in China's leadership transition that impedes systemic reform and affects the country's growth. Notwithstanding low growth forecasts for the entire developed world, these systemic risks, taken individually and in combination, appear to be declining, although certainly not to the point that they can be dismissed.
On balance, then, the multispeed growth patterns of the past decade are likely to continue. Even as the developed economies experience an extended period of below-trend growth, the emerging economies will remain an important growth engine.
Michael Spence, a Nobel laureate in economics, is professor of economics at New York University's Stern School of Business. © Project Syndicate
Related articles:
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
![paiment methods](https://static.themoscowtimes.com/img/contribute/payment_icons.png)
Remind me later.