×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Mixing Messages

Слова, слова, слова: Words, words, words

I'm a pretty upbeat person, someone who can usually find the sunny side of any situation — or at least the funny side. But I have to admit that the past few days have gotten even me down.

And they've gotten me worried about my Russian-language ability. I listen to speeches and read transcripts, and I seem to understand all the words just fine. But they don't make sense to me.

Take Dmitry Peskov, press secretary for Prime Minister President Vladimir Putin. First he said publicly that полиции надо было действовать жёстче 6 мая (the police should have been tougher on May 6). I found that odd. What about following the law and using appropriate force?

But then, according to Just Russia Duma Deputy Ilya Ponomaryov, Peskov clarified his first statement: Ещё слишком мягко сказано было. За раненного омоновца надо размазать печень митингующих по асфальту. (That was said too delicately. The demonstrators' livers ought to be smeared on the asphalt for every wounded OMON riot policeman.)

When did it become OK for public figures to use that kind of violent language? Was he misquoted? If he was, why hasn't he complained?

And then I just don't get this statement from Putin's press service: Отметив, что у него есть обязательства завершить процесс назначений в состав нового правительства России, президент Путин выразил сожаление в связи с тем, что не сможет присутствовать на саммите "восьмёрки" в Кэмп-Дэвиде (Noting his responsibilities to finalize Cabinet appointments to the new Russian government, President Putin expressed regret that he wouldn't be able to attend the Group of Eight summit at Camp David.)

I get the words, but I don't get it. If there's one person on the planet who knows what duties await a new Russian president, it's Vladimir Putin. So why did he go along with the original idea of holding the meeting at Camp David to accommodate him if he wasn't sure he could attend?

And besides, just a few days before at his inauguration, he said, "Мы хотим и будем жить в успешной России, которую уважают в мире как надёжного, открытого, честного и предсказуемого партнёра" (We want — and will live in — a flourishing Russia, which is respected in the world as a reliable, open, honest and predictable partner).

Maybe I'm nuts, but doesn't "predictable" apply to attending major international meetings as promised? But maybe a "predictable and reliable partner" means something different to Vladimir Putin.

But Putin is sending President Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev in his stead, and as presidential aide Arkady Dvorkovich said: Он работал президентом России четыре года и всеми этими темами занимался (He worked as Russia's president for four years, and he knows all those topics). So I guess the benefit of the job swap at the top is that the current prime minister is в теме (up to speed) with the issues.

I don't understand Medvedev's words either. He recommended that his Open Government прививает правовую культуру гражданам России (cultivates a legal culture in the citizens of Russia) and then added: Всем. В том числе нашему передовому классу, нашим горожанам, которые гуляют где хотят (In everyone — including our progressive class and our citizens who walk around wherever they want).

And walking around wherever you want is … a problem? Annoying? Against the law?

I just don't get what they are trying to say.

Michele A. Berdy, a Moscow-based translator and interpreter, is author of "The Russian Word's Worth" (Glas), a collection of her columns.

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more