×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

How Iran Can Help Give a Boost to Reset

In the wake of growing tension around Iran's nuclear program, 2012 looks like it will be another challenging year for both the United States and Russia. Perhaps the most difficult and time-consuming question confronting Washington and Moscow today is how best to proceed on Iran.

Even though Tehran has consistently denied allegations that it is seeking to develop a bomb, the latest International Atomic Energy Agency report appears to confirm what most analysts have long suspected. After presenting new evidence suggesting that Iran is secretly working on a nuclear weapon, nonproliferation experts have begun to think strategically of imminent dangers from Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Moscow and Washington have a shared interest in preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons but they have divergent views on Iran. Washington sees Iran's nuclear activities as a pressing threat that must be eliminated; whereas Moscow has repeatedly stressed Iran's geopolitical and economic role as Russia's strategic partner in the sectors of petroleum, atomic energy and arms.

Given historical instability in the greater Middle East, the prospects of a nuclear Iran look disturbing. Paradoxically, Iran's possession of a nuclear weapon would change the strategic balance in the entire region and could fundamentally challenge Russia's security policy in the southern tier of the post-Soviet territory. A nuclear-ready Iran could embolden regional extremists and terrorist networks and eventually destabilize many countries in Eurasia. Such a scenario contains some serious risks for the Kremlin's security policy in Russia's southern borders and would have a number of potentially important strategic consequences for the south Caucasus and Caspian Basin.

Whether the United States and Russia will succeed in coordinating their policies on Iran will depend considerably on their ability to solve the complexities of the Iranian nuclear crisis. But there are already two important points of agreement between Washington and Moscow on the Iranian issue. Both are against nuclear weapons proliferation and both desire to defeat global terrorist networks that would like to get their hands on nuclear weapons. 

Elkhan Nuriyev is author of "The South Caucasus at the Crossroads."

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more