×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

New Beef on Jackson-Vanik: It's Illegal

It is like a broken record. Each time a U.S. dignitary comes to Moscow, he promises Russian officials that the Jackson-Vanik amendment will be repealed soon.

This game has been played for 20 years or more, while the amendment itself is 36 years old, having been passed unanimously by the U.S. Congress in 1974 and signed into law by President Gerald Ford on Jan. 3, 1975.

Few leaders miss the opportunity to repeat the standard phrases that the Jackson-Vanik amendment is a relic of the Cold War that is completely irrelevant in the post-Soviet era and contradicts reason and common sense.

Then Richard Perle entered the arena. Perle, who served as deputy defense secretary in the administration of U.S. President Ronald Reagan and before that as the top adviser to Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson — the Jackson of Jackson-Vanik — spoke at the World Russia Forum in Washington two weeks ago and made two interesting points.

Point one: Although the amendment in question may have been intended to help Jewish emigration when it was drafted in 1974, contrary to popular belief, there is no mention of either Jews, Russia or the Soviet Union in the text of the law. Therefore, strictly speaking, the amendment applies to any country without a free market economy and one that restricts the emigration of its citizens.

Point two: The amendment applied to countries that fall under two criteria: nonmarket economy and lack of freedom of emigration.

The obvious conclusion is that since Russia is now a free market economy and has no emigration restrictions at all, it automatically has to be excluded from this amendment. Thus, the continued application of Jackson-Vanik to Russia is illegal. Therefore, you could argue, those who object to graduating Russia from Jackson-Vanik could open themselves up to a lawsuit from the Russian government.

One wonders whether it’s incompetence or a naive faith in the goodness of human nature that is responsible for the Russian authorities’ failure to make use of handy legal instruments to put the Jackson-Vanik amendment once and for all where it naturally belongs — the annals of Cold War history.

Edward Lozansky is president of the American University in Moscow.

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more