Although it has been several weeks since the Institute of Contemporary Development published its report titled “21st-Century Russia: Reflections on an Attractive Tomorrow,” it continues to be a source of heightened discussion. One of the most sensational projections in the report is that Russia, once modernized, can become a member of NATO.
It is obvious that the report was projecting many years into the future and wasn’t referring to Russia today, whose leaders never tire of warning about Western democracy and NATO expansion and whose newly released military doctrine places NATO as the largest external military danger. Moreover, Russia does not even come close to meeting NATO’s political standards. Take, for example, the bloated Federal Security Service that simultaneously battles nonexistent spies, economic crimes and terrorism. Look at the country’s police force, which citizens fear more than they fear hardened criminals.
In reality, of course, the main problem in Russian-NATO relations is not the danger of a military confrontation but the “values gap” that threatens Russia more than anything else. The Kremlin has stated dozens of times in many different forms that it does not intend to structure Russia’s life according to foolish Western concepts such as the rule of law, respect for civil liberties and human rights because the formerly Soviet population is not mature enough for freedom. Vladimir Putin once said the country needs 20 years of “manual control” before that could happen.
This mind-set was the main reason why Putin was so angry after Georgia and Ukraine announced their desire to join NATO several years ago. The prospect of “NATO bases” in Georgia and Ukraine armed with U.S. midrange missiles (which were destroyed 20 years ago as a result of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987) was not the real problem for Putin, of course. What stung Putin the most was that Tbilisi and Kiev made the unexpected claim that their countries subscribed to Western standards of democracy and values and were committed to developing those institutions further as a condition for joining NATO. This was a firm rejection of Putin’s “manual control” model.
Moscow insists that NATO should transform itself from a military bloc into a political alliance. But that process started a long time ago. Contrary to Kremlin allegations, NATO has not increased its military potential by granting membership to former Soviet satellite states. The thousands of dilapidated, rusty, 50-year-old, Soviet-made tanks located in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria do nothing to increase NATO’s military potential. It would take hundreds of billions of dollars to bring the armies of Eastern European member states up to modern standards, and NATO does not have those resources at its disposal. That is why when Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and the Baltic states sought NATO membership, the alliance radically lowered its military requirements for new members — for example, in these countries only one regiment or battalion needed to conform to modern requirements, and only those units would be used in actual fighting.
The true “NATO expansion” today is not defined in terms of tanks, bases or battalions but in terms of the alliance’s political expansion — the list of requirements that would-be members must have functioning democratic institutions, a real separation of powers, transparent military budgets adopted by the parliament and civil control over the military. The authors of the Institute of Contemporary Development report believe that post-modernization Russia could, in theory, conform to those democratic standards. If NATO would ever accept Russia as a full member, it would be a firm recognition that Russia had successfully carried out democratic reforms and has joined the league of democracies.
In terms of national security, NATO membership would also guarantee Russia protection from external threats, including the hypothetical threat from China and the very real threat from Islamic extremists, drug trafficking and piracy. The report predicts that the first step toward forming a true partnership between Russia and NATO will be working together in a joint peacekeeping operation in a developing country.
Alexander Golts is deputy editor of the online newspaper Yezhednevny Zhurnal.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.