Nearly half of some 500 court decisions reviewed by the Supreme Court in the second half of 2009 turned out to be wrong, the country's court of last resort said, highlighting the challenges that the Kremlin faces in overhauling the country's troubled judicial system.
Legal experts said Wednesday that the figures were probably just the tip of the iceberg. Litigating parties often decide against filing complaints because they have little trust in the legal system.
As an instance of last resort, the Supreme Court only reviews cases where a dissatisfied party challenges a lower court's decision.
The Supreme Court said it had accepted 481 out of 834 requests to review criminal cases decided by lower courts in the last six months of 2009. "Laws and procedures were applied wrongly in 40 percent of these decisions," the court said in a report posted on its web site Tuesday.
Yana Yakovleva, chairwoman of the Business Solidarity partnership, a pressure group for judicial reform, said the number of cases that were reviewed represented a tiny fraction of the some 1 million criminal cases tried every year. "This figure is based on less than 900, so there are many thousands we will never hear of," she told The Moscow Times.
Viktor Ilyukhin, a Communist State Duma deputy and former prosecutor, said 40 percent was a very high rate. "This means that when we debate judicial reform, we must also speak about the qualification of judges," he said.
Anatoly Kucherena, a prominent lawyer who heads the Public Chamber's commission on legal reform, agreed that the numbers were alarming. "We need to carefully analyze how professional judges can make such errors," he said.
Supreme Court Chairman Vyacheslav Lebedev raised the subject himself last week when he told a regional judges' meeting in Samara that a more rigorous selection process was needed.
"There is currently no system for training judges. They are selected by standard criteria. We need special institutes to prepare them for work over the course of one year," he said, according to the 63.ru web site.
But experts agreed that a well-trained judge was of little use if he could not be independent.
Yakovleva, a financial director of a Moscow-based chemical company who spent seven months in a pretrial detention center on charges that were later dropped, said the main problem was that judges felt intimidated by prosecutors.
"Too often, judges just do not dare to rule against the prosecutor's closing arguments," she said.
Critics have long maintained that the country's legal system is overly punitive.
Supreme Court Chief Justice Lebedev said earlier this year that while Russian courts last year convicted more than 920,000 people, the number of acquittals was less than 1 percent of that figure.
Ilyukhin pointed to widespread allegations that judges rule according to prior orders received from government officials over the telephone. "As long as we have this system of telephone justice, all reforms won't bring us far," he said.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.